M/S VENKATESHWARA STONE CRUSHER v. MR.
Get free access to the complete judgment in M/S VENKATESHWARA STONE CRUSHER v. MR. MANJUNATH J on CaseMine. Log In. India; UK & Ireland Hi, I'm AMICUS. ... complainants to take action against the accused persons under the provisions of Sections 11 …
اقرأ أكثر
Himachal Pradesh High Court backs GST on mining royalty
In a significant ruling, the Himachal Pradesh High Court has upheld the state's authority to impose Goods and Services Tax (GST) on mining royalties, adding clarity to the …
اقرأ أكثر
M/S. PUTTAPPA STONE CRUSHERS AND M-SAND v. THE …
ORDER . Learned counsel for the petitioner invited our attention to the order passed by the Division Bench of this Court in W.P.No.22283/2022 dated 15.03.2023, a copy of which is placed on record, wherein this Court taking note of its earlier order dated 12.06.2019 passed in W.P.No.54476/2016 c/w W.P.No.51135/2016 in the case of DHANANJAY …
اقرأ أكثر
M/S. Sarala Stone Crusher v. Member Secretary,State
Get free access to the complete judgment in M/S. Sarala Stone Crusher v. Member Secretary,State Pollution Control Board Another on CaseMine. ... It is also to inform you that as per the recent direction of the Hon'ble High Court dt. 4/8/2010 passed in WPC No. 9101/2009-M/S. Trishakti Stone Crushing Unit and others vrs State of Orissa and Others ...
اقرأ أكثر
M/S.SHRI MAHALAXMI STONE CRUSHER v. THE STATE OF …
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA) This petition filed under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution makes a prayer to set aside the notice dated 25.10.2024 issued by respondent No.3 - the Deputy Commissioner & the Licensing Authority, District Stone Crushers Licensing & Regulation Authority, Vijayapura.
اقرأ أكثر
Ishwar Singh v. State Of Haryana And Others
The Court reiterated that no stone crushers should operate in the Union Territory of Delhi without valid licenses and that a designated "crushing zone" was established to rehabilitate existing crushers. ... It was submitted that despite the judgment of the Supreme Court in M.C Mehta's case (supra), the Government of Punjab have not taken ...
اقرأ أكثر
KUMAUN STONE CRUSHER ASSOCIATION & OTHERS v. STATE …
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND Writ Petition No. 2413 of 2012(M/S) Kumaun Stone Crusher Association and others Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and others.Respondents With Writ Petition No. 2494 of 2012 (M/S) M/s Uttaranchal Associates Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and others.Respondents With Writ Petition No. 2514 …
اقرأ أكثر
M/S SRI KRISHNA STONE CRUSHING INDUSTRIES v. STATE …
Get free access to the complete judgment in M/S SRI KRISHNA STONE CRUSHING INDUSTRIES v. STATE OF KARNATAKA on CaseMine. ... IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU . DATED THIS THE 12 TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2022 . PRESENT . THE HON'BLE MR. RITU RAJ AWASTHI, CHIEF JUSTICE . AND.
اقرأ أكثر
M/s. Sai Ram Stone Crusher v. The State of Telangana
or the C lncession Rules or lely a penalty since only a Court ol compete rt jurisdiction can go into the question of lery ol penalty. 3. The above order was followed by 3 Co-ordinate Benches in this Cou rt which gave intcrim relief to thc petitioners in those cases. ln one of the orders in W.P.No.l4963 of 2024, the learned Single Judge granted interim relief to the …
اقرأ أكثر
SRI. THAZHATHERI HASHIM, v. M/S SUPER STONE CRUSHER
in the high court of kerala at ernakulam. present. the honourable mr. justice devan ramachandran. monday, the 9 th day of october 2023 / 17th aswina, 1945. ar no. 137 of 2023. petitioner: sri. thazhatheri hashim, aged 69 years
اقرأ أكثر
eLegalix
It is further argued that the petitioner has filed an Original Application No. 278 of 2019 before the National Green Tribunal, New Delhi for taking remedial action against the illegal operation of stone crushers in Sukrit Area of District Sonebhadra, in which, vide order dated 28.03.2019 the Tribunal constituted a joint committee comprising of ...
اقرأ أكثر
State Of Uttaranchal vs M/S. Kumaon Stone Crusher on 15 …
All the writ petitioners supported the judgment of Uttarakhand High Court dated 01.07.2004 in M/s Kumaon Stone Crusher wherein, the High Court has held that no levy of Transit Fee can be made on the finished items of stone i.e. stone grits, sand grits & chips etc.
اقرأ أكثر
M/S OM STONE CRUSHER v. STATE OF HP AND OTHERS
Get free access to the complete judgment in M/S OM STONE CRUSHER v. STATE OF HP AND OTHERS on CaseMine. Get free access to the complete judgment in M/S OM STONE CRUSHER v. ... of the petitioner keeping in view the settled law because the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the judgment of this Hon'ble Court dated 03-08-2023 in …
اقرأ أكثر
M/S V K Stone Crusher vs Raj State Pollution Control on 20 July, …
That is why this Court granted an interim order earlier and directed that no mining and stone-crushing operations shall be carried on within a distance of 1 km from the lake or reservoir and …
اقرأ أكثر
M/s. Bushra Stone Crusher v. State of Telangana | Telangana High Court
Get free access to the complete judgment in M/s. Bushra Stone Crusher v. State of Telangana on CaseMine.
اقرأ أكثر
M/S Om Stone Crusher v. State & Ors., Jammu and Kashmir High Court
In this petition, the petitioner, inter alia, seeks writ of mandamus commanding the respondents not to collect the tax from the petitioner for private land/road where the stone crusher has been installed and to collect the toll tax as per Section 4 of Levy of Toll Tax Act read with Section 2(i) of Levy of Toll Rules from the post where the same ...
اقرأ أكثر
Ashok Stone Crusher,... v. State Of Uttarakhand...
Learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon the Judgment passed on 26-06-2007 by the Division Bench of this Court in Writ Petition No. 993 of 2004 (M/S), Ms. Gupta Builders v. State of Uttaranchal Para 21 of the said judgment is quoted below:-
اقرأ أكثر
State Of Uttaranchal vs M/S. Kumaon Stone Crusher on 15 …
The Allahabad High Court, in its judgment in Kumar Stone Works (Supra) decided on 27.04.2005 has given a detailed reasoning for not accepting stone grits, stone chips and …
اقرأ أكثر
M/S Lakhwinder Sigh Stone Crushers vs . Uoi & Ors. on 7 …
Himachal Pradesh High Court M/S Lakhwinder Sigh Stone Crushers vs . Uoi & Ors. on 7 November, 2023 Bench: Mamidanna Satya Ratna Sri Ramachandra Rao, Jyotsna Rewal Dua M/s Lakhwinder Sigh Stone Crushers Vs.UOI & Ors.. CWP No.8637 of 2023 . 07.11.2023 Present: Mr. Sahil Singla, Mr. Sachit Singla and Mr. Arvind Sharma, Advocates, for the petitioner.
اقرأ أكثر
BHARAT STONE CRUSHER... v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA.
WPs 3685TO3692,4930&4931/17 1 Common Judgment. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO. 3685/2017. Jai Gajanan Stone Crusher, through its Proprietor/Partner Namdeo Ananda Bhonde, Aged about 46 years, Resident of Pimprideshmukh, Tq.
اقرأ أكثر
M/S MAHAGANAPATHI STONE CRUSHERS v. STATE OF …
period of twenty years from the date of original grant effective from 18.12.2013 valid up till 17.12.2033 in terms of recent amendment to section 5(2) of karnataka regulation of stone crusher amendment act, 2020 w.e.f. 30.03.2020, pursuant to a renewal application dated: 03.09.2018 and representation dated: 13.06.2020 filed by this petitioner in gazette notified …
اقرأ أكثر
GULJAMA SHAH JAHIR SHAH Vs SADGURA KAKA STONE CRUSHER …
Get free access to the complete judgment in GULJAMA SHAH JAHIR SHAH Vs SADGURA KAKA STONE CRUSHER THR. ITS PROPRIETOR NAGENDRA BHIKAJI ROHANKAR on CaseMine. ... in fact, the trial Court has considered the judgment passed by this Court, in Ashwin's case (supra) and has in paragraph 6 reproduced that part of the order …
اقرأ أكثر
M/S SIDDALINGESHWARA STORE CRUSHER v. STATE OF …
Get free access to the complete judgment in M/S SIDDALINGESHWARA STORE CRUSHER v. STATE OF KARNTAKA on CaseMine. ... Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. Board of Immigration Appeals. Special Courts. Bankruptcy. State. Alabama. Alaska. Arkansas.
اقرأ أكثر
M/s RUHANI STONE CRUSHER v. STATE OF HP AND ORS
2. 03.08.2023. He further submits that representation has also been made by the petitioner in this regard and it would be in the interest of justice, in case, this petition is disposed of with the direction that let the representation of the petitioner be decided by the Competent Authority, in terms of the averments made in the representation as well as the judgment being …
اقرأ أكثر
M/S VENKATESHWARA STONE CRUSHER v. MR.
Get free access to the complete judgment in M/S VENKATESHWARA STONE CRUSHER v. MR. MANJUNATH J on CaseMine. Log In. India; UK & Ireland Hi, I'm AMICUS. ... complainants to take action against the accused persons under the provisions of Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Court Act, for deliberately disobeying the order dated 28-07-2021 ...
اقرأ أكثر
M/S. Jehlum Stone Crusher Petitioners v. State & Ors. S
Get free access to the complete judgment in M/S. Jehlum Stone Crusher Petitioners v. State & Ors. S on CaseMine. Get free access to the complete judgment in M/S. …
اقرأ أكثر
State Of Uttaranchal vs M/S. Kumaon Stone Crusher on 27 July, …
It would be open to the appellant to apply to the High Court for stay of the demand during the pendency of the writ petition and request the High Court to dispose of the writ …
اقرأ أكثر
M/S NANDINI STONE CRUSHER v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN) 1. Petitioner is a partnership firm involved in the business of stone quarrying. It is its case that it has been granted the necessary licence to quarry building stone in 2 acres 38 guntas of land in Sy.2/1 of Alkopparaa Village, Muddebihala Taluk, Vijayapura District.
اقرأ أكثر
JUDGMENT/ORDER IN
JUDGMENT/ORDER IN - WRIT - C No. 51134 of 2015 at Allahabad Dated-12.7.2019 CASE TITLE - Anil Kumar Pandey Vs. State Of U.P. And 4 Others ... Supreme Court in Kumaon Stone Crusher, case (Supra) has held that the provisions relating to transport or storage of minerals are only incidental and ancilliary in nature. If the minerals are "forest ...
اقرأ أكثر